| « District Clerk's Case Set for Trial | Judge Suzanne Wooten trial: Day 1 (updated) » |
Constitutional Amendments results, 2011
Collin County had a pathetic 3% voter turnout, but statewide it was 5%. It is interesting that the county which has a much higher educated and an affluent (and apathetic) population, but still voted about 40% lower rate than the rest of Texas.
The County did not vote to approve half of the Constitutional Amendments. Collin County voters refused to approve: Prop 3 (Bonds for college loans), Prop 4 (Bonds for blighted redevelopment), Prop 6 (To distribute for money from the permanent school land funds), Prop 7 (Bonds for conservation and parks), and Prop 8 (To appraise land for water-stewardship purposes).
But statewide, the voters approved all of the constitutional amendments except for, Prop 4 (Bonds for blighted redevelopment), Prop 7 (an El Paso County permission to form a reclamation district) and Prop 8 (To appraise land for water-stewardship purposes).
All the local propositions including Plano and McKinney were approved by the voters.
Collin County has all polling place results. The turnout was 3.1%
The State of Texas statewide results are not complete, but 96% of the precincts have reported. The statewide turnout 5%.
The 10 Constitutional Amendments proposed are:
1. "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran."
Collin County:
- For: 10,560 (80.65%)
- Against: 2,534 (19.35%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 82.86%
- Against: 17.13%
2. “The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $6 billion at any time outstanding.”
Collin County:
- For: 6,956 (53.55%)
- Against: 6,033 (46.45%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 51.43%
- Against: 48.56%
3. "The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds of the State of Texas to finance educational loans to students.”
Collin County:
- For: 5,899 (45.29%)
- Against: 7,126 (54.71%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 54.45%
- Against: 45.54%
4. "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit a county to issue bonds or notes to finance the development or redevelopment of an unproductive, underdeveloped, or blighted area and to pledge for repayment of the bonds or notes increases in ad valorem taxes imposed by the county on property in the area. The amendment does not provide authority for increasing ad valorem tax rates."
Collin County:
- For: 5,314 (41.01%)
- Against: 7,643 (58.99%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 40.20%
- Against: 59.79%
5. "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to allow cities or counties to enter into interlocal contracts with other cities or counties without the imposition of a tax or the provision of a sinking fund."
Collin County:
- For: 8,023 (62.03%)
- Against: 4,912 (37.97%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 57.93%
- Against: 42.06%
6. "The constitutional amendment clarifying references to the permanent school fund, allowing the General Land Office to distribute revenue from permanent school fund land or other properties to the available school fund to provide additional funding for public education, and providing for an increase in the market value of the permanent school fund for the purpose of allowing increased distributions from the available school fund."
Collin County:
- For: 5,750 (44.29%)
- Against: 7,233 (55.71%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 51.44%
- Against: 48.55%
7. "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."
Collin County:
- For: 6,168 (48.41%)
- Against: 6,573 (51.59%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 48.24%
- Against: 51.75%
8. "The constitutional amendment providing for the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of open-space land devoted to water-stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity."
Collin County:
- For: 6,280 (48.81%)
- Against: 6,586 (51.19%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 46.94%
- b>Against: 53.05%
9. "The constitutional amendment authorizing the governor to grant a pardon to a person who successfully completes a term of deferred adjudication community supervision."
Collin County:
- For: 7,490 (57.77%)
- Against: 5,476 (42.23%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 57.18%
- Against: 42.81%
10. "The constitutional amendment to change the length of the unexpired term that causes the automatic resignation of certain elected county or district officeholders if they become candidates for another office.
Collin County:
- For: 7,413 (57.40%)
- Against: 5,501 (42.60%)
Texas statewide:
- For: 55.91%
- Against: 44.08%
Bill
2 comments
Unlike past elections, where certain groups benefited by voters' decisions, I never saw a single ad, commercial or mailing about a darn thing. No one really promoted participation (other than lengthening city council terms, which runs counter to the whole "throw out the incumbents" mentality). Besides, no one in Austin pays any attention to what voters say or pass. So why bother?
Comments are closed for this post.