The US Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal from convicted murderer Charles Dean Hood. Hood's attorneys had asked the court to order a new trial based on the admission of the judge and District Attorney that they had previously been in an adulterous affair.
While the court's decision will mean Hood will not get a new trial on the facts of the case, a Texas Court has already ordered a new sentencing trial based on other technical issues.
Bill
===============================
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal by Charles Dean Hood in Case of Prosecutor and Judge Making Beast With Two Backs
Monday, April 19, 2010
From Bloomberg: By Greg Stohr
April 19 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal from a convicted double murderer who said his Texas trial was tainted because the judge and prosecutor previously had a sexual relationship.
The justices today left intact a Texas appeals court’s refusal to reopen Charles Dean Hood’s case.
Hood, 40, contended that the affair between Judge Verla Sue Holland and Thomas S. O’Connell Jr. had cast a “deep shadow” over the Texas criminal justice system and violated his constitutional rights. Dozens of ethicists and former judges, state officials and prosecutors -- including former FBI Director William S. Sessions -- urged the court to take up the case.
“We believe his case was marred by a fundamental misjustice,” said Andrea Keilen, the director of the Texas Defender Service, which represents Hood. She said in a statement that she was “disheartened” by the rejection.
Hood was convicted in 1990 of killing his boss and his boss’s girlfriend in the house the three shared. His lawyers say they didn’t have firm evidence of the long-rumored affair until 2008, shortly before he was scheduled to be executed.
Collin County Criminal District Attorney John R. Roach said that Hood’s lawyers had reason to suspect the affair years earlier and that they waited too long to raise the issue in court. Roach argued that Hood had previously filed seven so- called habeas corpus petitions seeking to overturn his conviction.
The issue “should have been raised, addressed and resolved many years ago,” Roach argued.
Holland and O’Connell eventually testified that they were involved in a relationship for several years in the 1980s and had been in love with one another. Both were married.
A Texas court threw out Hood’s death sentence on unrelated grounds earlier this year.
The case is Hood v. Texas, 09-8610.
This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...
You can observe a lot by just watching.
Yogi Berra
It is my hope that this forum will serve as an acute observer of Collin County government, leading to the return of the county to those it is supposed to serve.
I will post my opinions, fair analysis, news clippings that are relevant to local issues, and your comments.
To post your comment, you may register, or you may post anonymously. Comments will be reviewed before being placed online.
Comments that I consider inappropriate will be deleted, and the commentator warned. All I ask is that discussions remain civil and courteous. The standard for comments here is "common courtesy".
Subscribers will receive an email whenever a new blog entry is posted.
Find more discussion of CCO topics on The Collin County Observer Facebook Group.
|
TESTIMONIALS "Love you to death Bill, but you're like a hemmoroid that keeps swelling and won't go away." "Your premise is wrong, as it often is." "...lost ALL objectivity in coverage long ago" |
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||