Judge accuses DA of "forum shopping" and "needless expense": DA appeals (updated)

12/21/09

Permalink 02:15:58 am, by bill Email , 1167 words,   English (US)
Categories: Observer Opinions, Law, Crime & Punishment

Judge accuses DA of "forum shopping" and "needless expense": DA appeals (updated)

On December 3, 2009 a man was brought before Judge Jill Willis's 429th District Court. Visiting Judge John McCraw was on the bench. The defendant, Robert Lee Blackburn was charged with 4 felonies after he bit a Plano Police officer while being arrested for possession of cocaine.

Blackburn wanted to plead guilty to all 4 charges. Judge McCraw was asking Blackburn if he understood what a plea of guilty could mean when John Rolater, the Chief of the District Attorney's Appellate Division, objected. Rolater demanded a jury trial, and accused Judge McCraw of holding a bench trial (a trial where a judge, not a jury renders a verdict).

The Judge responded saying, "Sir, I'm not conducting a bench trial. I'm accepting his constitutional right to enter a plea before the Court. I would submit the United States Constitution allows a defendant the right to enter a plea based on the Court's request and to avoid needless four jury trials and have at least a couple of hundred county citizens come forward [as potential jurors, (ed.)] and waive their right to make any type of living that day and costing the county some $5,000 per trial. I don't understand why the State is refusing to allow the defendant... to enter a plea of guilty."

Later in the verbal exchange, Judge McCraw asked Mr. Rolater, "So the State wants to control who sets the punishment hearing. Is that what the fight is about?

Rolater replied, "Your honor, the State does not consent to the defendant's waiver of a jury trial."

And the judge repeated his question, "So the State is, in effect, forum shopping for a particular judge to fix the punishment here. Is that the bottom line?"

Judge McCraw then said, "... you're attempting to create four jury trials unnecessarily. I just don't understand that."

Texas law does require that in order to hold a bench trial, the defendant, the judge and the State must all agree to waive a jury trial. Since most guilty pleas are settled in a plea bargain where the State's attorney and the defendant agree on the punishment, a guilty plea where no punishment is agreed upon in advance is unusual (but not rare).

When, as in this case, the was no plea bargain, and the State objects to a bench trial, it can put the defense in the position of holding a "sham" trial where no defense witnesses are called, and there is no cross examination of the State's witnesses. The jury has really no option but to render a verdict of guilty. However, the defendant may still request that the judge, and not a jury set the punishment. The jury is only allowed to establish guilt or innocence, on a person who has already tried to plead guilty.

These "sham" trials are expensive. They require a jury pool to be summoned. The legal expenses mount up, and valuable court time is wasted. And they happen here in Collin County.

Why?

There are several possible reasons. One is exactly what Judge McCraw was charging. That the District Attorney wants to control which judge sets punishment. In Blackburn's case, Judge McCraw, after accepting the guilty pleas, would then set a date for a punishment hearing. The judge at that punishment hearing, and the one who would set punishment, would be Judge Jill Willis. (A jury trial date had already been set - the trial would have been heard by the visiting judge).

So McCraw was accusing the DA of not wanting Judge Willis to determine the punishment. And he was accusing the DA's office of wasting county money, and jurors' time to do so.

The Collin County Observer has talked with several local defense attorneys. They all told the Observer they believe that the Collin County District Attorney does not want certain judges to set punishment. One of those judges is the newly appointed Judge Willis.

Another possible reason for the DA to refuse to permit a bench trial is rooted in the policies of the Collin County District Attorney's office. Sources who know the system have told the Observer that in this county, a prosecutor's performance is rated primarily by one metric -- the percentage of jury trials resulting in a guilty verdict. Any prosecutor who does not maintain at least a passing average, will not be employed by the county for long. Promotions and raises are all largely based on this win percentage of jury trials.

Prosecutors therefore have an incentive to plea bargain the difficult to prove cases and to take to a jury the slam dunk, easy cases -- even if the trial is just a 'sham'.

Earlier this year, Harris County floated an idea that would be another reason for the State to object to a jury trial waiver - they wanted new, young prosecutors to get more trial experience. They wanted to force defendants to go before a jury so that the States attorney could practice on easy cases. That idea was finally shot down after a howl of protests from the defense bar.

In the Blackburn case, Judge McCraw made his opinion clear. At one point he told Mr. Rolater, "I think we ought to clarify it for the appellate court. As I say, if they want to be involved in forum shopping, fine. Let them do it.... I think the Constitution of the United States allows an individual to enter a plea to the duly appointed judge. That's all I've attempted to do here."

"[The] Court will find that's a waste of judicial economy and needless cost to the citizens of this county for four jury trials, much less the expense of bringing the jurors in to try a case when an individual desires to enter a plea of guilty and allow a duly elected judge to fix the punishment."

On Monday, December 7, the Collin County District Attorney appealed Judge McCraw's ruling to the 5th Court of Appeals in Dallas. The same day, the appeals court ordered a temporary halt in the proceedings against Robert Lee Blackburn.

It is not known when the appeals court will make its decision.

Bill

-----------

UPDATE (December 21, 2009):

The Fifth Court of Appeals has given the defense until December 30 to respond to Roach's appeal.

Hunter Biederman, aka The Frisco DWI Lawyer has written an article that significantly adds to the story I've told here. Hunter's experience as a Collin County trial lawyer adds depth to the explanations of what choices the defendant was facing in the plea hearing. In addition, Hunter was in the court room that day and witnessed the Mr. Blackburn's plea hearing.

You can read his article titled, Collin County DA Denies Citizen From Pleading Guilty here.

Bill

========================================

Notes:

Petition for Writ of Mandamus, In re John Roach, Fifth COA case number 05-09-01451-cv

Reporters Record, December 3, 2009 Texas vs Robert Lee Blackburn

Order granting Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief, In re John Roach, Court of Appeals, Fifth District.

Link to Court of Appeals case 05-09-014510-CV, In re John Roach

Link to Collin County cases 199-80283-08, 199-80284-08, 199-80285-08, 199-80286-08, State vs. Robert Lee Blackburn

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Collin County Attorney [Visitor] Email
This is sadly typical and it happens all the time - and not just with this DA. This occurred with Tom O'Connell's office as well. This has just been how Collin County prosecutes cases.

The Court of Appeals will probably rule in the DA's favor - they usually do.

But, this is a waste of money, time, and judicial resources all in the name of playing a game to pad DA Office statistics.

This is certainly not how a conservative would spend my tax dollars. I hope the next DA will discontinue this wasteful practice.

I hope that various candiates for DA as well as a current assistant DA who is running for judge speaks out against these practices.
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 08:30
Comment from: Tony Vitz [Visitor] Email
Just because you can do something doesn't make it the right thing to do. This D.A.'s office has a history of disregarding what is right. Many of the attorney's in that office never learned to respect the court, but they've never had a good example and really don't know any better.
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 08:46
Comment from: anon [Visitor]
Remember when Bill Clinton resisted leaving the lime light of Washington for so long after his second term was up? Most people I know felt it was an out of control ego which could not leave the stroking. Most people felt it was embarrasingly comical.

The district attorney reminds me so much of this same ego issue except in this case it is dangerous. Who would have thought the district attorney and Bill Clinton would have so much in common?
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 08:59
Comment from: Pam Lakatos [Visitor] Email
Thank you for reporting this story. John Roach’s office is notorious for this. Not only is this used to force defendant’s whose cases are great for the State to trial so that the District Attorney can brag about his conviction rate, it is also used to prevent Judges from being able to choose from all the possible punishment options available when a defendant pleads guilty without a recommendation from the District Attorney.

I am so proud of Judge McCraw for having the guts to shine a very public light on such an abuse of the legal process.

The voters of this county would be appalled if the true cost of this practice were to be made public. Some of my client’s have been the victims of this behavior. In every trial I have had where my client was placed in this position, the jurors who have spoken to the lawyers after the verdict have asked the same question: “Why did you waste our time?”

There are always going to be some cases that need to be tried to juries for a number of reasons applicable to both sides. It is a shame that our judicial system can be so cynically manipulated for a political purpose.

Most people do not care about what goes on in the Courts unless it personally affects them. They have no way of knowing just how powerful the position of District Attorney can be or how much it costs them when they have a District Attorney who is more interested in power and politics than justice.

I began my legal career in Tarrant County under Tim Curry. He was an honorable man who stayed in office for over 30 years because he never betrayed the trust of the citizens of Tarrant County. Having been shaped by that philosophy as a young lawyer, I hold public servants to a very high standard. I am sorry that this is happening in the county I now call home.

PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 09:07
Comment from: William D. Rowlett [Visitor] Email
I'd like to make it clear that it was NOT me who compared District Attorney John Roach to Bill Clinton. I'm sure it's not a flattering comparison to Mr. Roach.

In my 22 plus years of practicing law trying cases to juries, I've probably spoken to at least a thousand jurors who heard cases. I think I have a pretty good read on the pulse of the generic juror.

I can understand how a juror called into a courtroom, selected to be a juror, then told the defendant's pleaded guilty, find him guilty but you won't be deciding the punishment so go home now; I understand how that juror might be thinking "what did they need me for?" I think that's the point Judge McCraw was trying to make. From a taxpayer perspective, the juror probably wouldn't be too happy.

PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 09:51
Comment from: JT [Visitor] Email
The Collin County DA's office has some good prosecutors. But what they also have are a lot of prosecutors who have never been anywhere but Collin County. They've never seen how other (likely most) DA's offices carry out their duty to see that justice is done.
I was once in their shoes (having worked there) and I would tell you now that most of them would be shocked to go another DA's office and then compare that with Collin County.
I was listening to another elected DA speak a few days ago, and he was talking about doing what's right. Seeing that justice is done requires a goal and a dedication to doing what is right. That is sadly missing at the top levels of the DA's office. It's too easy to pervert "doing justice," into "getting convictions."
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 10:00
Comment from: Hunter [Visitor] Email · http://www.friscodwilawyer.com
Thanks for writing this article. This practice has been going on for a long time. I happened to be waiting in that court on a different case when this all went down. I think something that could explain a lot is if the transcript of the hearing before the Appellate Dept. got involved was available. I dont know if it was on the record or not.

(Beware, unsolicited blog plug ahead). I put my thoughts on this case in a post:

http://www.friscodwilawyer.com/2009/12/articles/district-attorney/collin-county-da-denies-citizen-from-pleading-guilty/

PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 11:13
Comment from: Chuck Bloom [Visitor] Email
To paraphrase Pete Townsend of the Who, "Meet the new corruption; same as the old corruption."
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 11:35
Comment from: bill [Member] Email
Hunter,

Your gratuitous self-promotion is appreciated. Your blog post added another dimension to mine.

I appreciate your knowledge and comments. The Observer's readers will gain further insight into this issue if they read your post,"Collin County DA Denies Citizen From Pleading Guilty", (http://www.friscodwilawyer.com/2009/12/articles/district-attorney/collin-county-da-denies-citizen-from-pleading-guilty/)

Bill

PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 11:40
Comment from: Tony Vitz [Visitor] Email
Good job, Hunter! Does that transcript deal with being disrespectful to the court?
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 12:11
Comment from: Tom Daley [Visitor]
Thanks to for Judge McCraw for standing up for the people of Collin County.

And thanks, Bill, for another thorough story with great outlinks and attachments.
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 12:57
Comment from: Anonymous Observer [Visitor] Email
A few facts not included in your story.

The DA offered Mr. Blackburn probation. Blackburn wasn't satisfied with this offer - he wanted deferred adjudication so that he could avoid a felony conviction. The DA refused to go along with Blackburn's demand.

So, what did Mr. Blackburn and his attorney do? They asked Judge McCraw to take the plea even though the DA wasn't willing to waive a jury trial. Why? Because it was the only way Blackburn could get deferred adjudication. And, unfortunately, Judge McCraw did just that - he accepted Blackburn's plea over the DA's objection - even though he was shown the law that guarantees the State of Texas a right to a jury trial.

In this case, the DA believed that justice was best served with probation and final convictions. Blackburn and his attorney were bound and determined to have their way so they did an end run to get what they wanted. Judge McCraw ignored the law because he disagreed with it. And, now the appellate court will have to waste its time telling Judge McCraw that he has to obey the law even if disagrees with it.

PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 20:42
Comment from: bill [Member] Email
Anonymous Observer,

I've been sitting here trying to figure out why you would post what appear to be obvious distortions and call them "facts". You act as if you have inside information on the plea offers. Do you have any evidence to back up what you are saying? Do you work for the DA?

The evidence I have seen is opposite of what you allege. From the transcripts I posted of the plea hearing:

On a direct question from the judge, the defense attorney stated, "I want to make it clear that we are not -- and I have never represented -- that we are going to be seeking deferred adjudication probation."

The judge replied, "The Court notes that there's no application for deferred and no plea papers for deferred...."

Rolater told the judge, "We believe the case is suitable for confinement in the Department of Criminal Justice."

The DA did not want probation. He wanted hard time. (and I'll say the defendant probably deserves quite a bit of hard prison time; he's got a long rap sheet, he physically attacked a police officer - he's obviously no angel)


The DA wanted McCraw or another visiting judge to set the sentence. They didn't want Jill Willis to do so. Why?

Your disinformation is transparently false.

I'll ask you, why lie?

Bill
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 21:29
Comment from: Anonymous [Visitor] Email
To address Anonymous Observer -

Those facts regarding deferred adjudication were, indeed, mentioned in the post. You didn't read all of the attachments.

The transcript reveals a discussion on that. The DA's office attempted that argument. Judge McCraw noted that there was no application for Deferred Adjudication - which is required.

It is an abuse of the citizens of Collin County to require them to sit as jurors to watch the "wink, wink, knod, knod" dance. I observe this all the time in bench "trials" and it is tragic.
PermalinkPermalink 12/21/09 @ 21:34
Comment from: Tony Vitz [Visitor] Email
Why do the prosecutors post anonymously? I understand living in fear in that office, but is that any way to live? With everything that is, and has been, going on in that office, I can't think of a better time to stand up for what is right.

PermalinkPermalink 12/22/09 @ 08:12

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

The Collin County Observer

You can observe a lot by just watching.
Yogi Berra

It is my hope that this forum will serve as an acute observer of Collin County government, leading to the return of the county to those it is supposed to serve.

I will post my opinions, fair analysis, news clippings that are relevant to local issues, and your comments.

To post your comment, you may register, or you may post anonymously. Comments will be reviewed before being placed online.

Comments that I consider inappropriate will be deleted, and the commentator warned. All I ask is that discussions remain civil and courteous. The standard for comments here is "common courtesy".

Subscribers will receive an email whenever a new blog entry is posted.

Bill Baumbach

Find more discussion of CCO topics on The Collin County Observer Facebook Group.

Add to Technorati Favorites

TESTIMONIALS

"Love you to death Bill, but you're like a hemmoroid that keeps swelling and won't go away."
Rick Neudorff, past Chair Collin County GOP

"Your premise is wrong, as it often is."
John R. Roach, Collin County District Attorney



September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Search

Files and Links

2006 Bill's Campaign for County Commissioner

County Government

Voting Rights & Education

Indigent Legal Defense

Indigent Healthcare

Texas Legislature

Texas Blogs

Commissioners Blogs

Mobility

2007 Bond Election

2008 Budget

Collin County Discussion Boards

Courts & Judiciary

Collin County Info & Stuff

Community Life, Art & Assistance

News Media

Financial Transparency

2009 Budget

Families & Children

Demographics

2010 Budget

Public Meeting Broadcasts & Videos

2010 Election

2010 Finance Reports

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 17

powered by b2evolution free blog software