Mark Bell's attorneys ask appeals court to force DA off the case

11/23/09

Permalink 12:02:32 am, by bill Email , 773 words,   English (US)
Categories: Observer Opinions, Law, Crime & Punishment

Mark Bell's attorneys ask appeals court to force DA off the case

Charging First Assistant District Attorney Greg Davis with "prosecutorial misconduct", attorneys for accused murderer Mark Bell have petitioned a Dallas appeals court to issue a "writ of mandamus" that would force District Attorney John Roach and his entire office to recuse themselves from the case against Bell.

If the DA's office was recused, an outside prosecutor would be brought in to conduct the investigation and capital murder trial against Bell, who is accused of the 2007 murder for hire killing of Craig Nail in Frisco.

The legal wrangling began in March of 2008, after Judge Mark Rusch issued an unprecedented search warrant allowing Frisco police to search the files of Bell's defense attorney, Keith Gore. According to papers filed with the court, the police seized a shoe box, some papers and took pictures of papers and files in Gore's office. In his filing before the appeals court, Gore alleges that pictures were taken of papers and files not in the warrant, that an important document is missing and presumed lost, and that the police also search the offices of other attorneys who shared the same building with Gore.

In their arguments before the court of appeals, Gore and Miears complain that the DA's office not only has copies of the defense files, but is actually using those files in an attempt to blunt defense strategy.

Gore had already been served with a grand jury subpoena and a hearing had been scheduled by Judge Robert Dry on a motion to quash the subpeonas when the police executed the warrant against Gore. The defense accuses the District Attorney of unethical "forum shopping" for a sympathetic judge since the DA went to Judge Rusch for the warrant while Judge Dry was working the case.

In their petition before the court of appeals, Gore and co-counsel Steven Miears ask the court to decide 5 issues:

  1. May a Prosecutor represent the State of Texas in a capital prosecution when that prosecutor has engaged in conduct which was designed to circumvent the due process rights of the defendant and which did, in fact,violate those rights?
  2. May a Prosecutor represent the State of Texas in a capital prosecution when that prosecutor has instigated actions which have resulted in the loss or destruction of exculpatory evidence thus denying defendant's due process rights?
  3. May a Prosecutor represent the State of Texas in a capital prosecution when that prosecutor has engaged in conduct which was designed to circumvent the defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel and which did, in fact, violate that right?
  4. Is a District Judge required to disqualify a Prosecutor from representing the State in a capital prosecution when evidence shows the prosecutor has engaged in conduct which deprived the defendant of his right to due process of law?
  5. Is a District Judge required to disqualify a Prosecutor from representing the State in a capital prosecution when evidence shows the prosecutor has engaged in conduct which deprived the defendant of his right to effective assistance of counsel?

Already, a visiting judge has ruled that Judge Mark Rusch remove himself from the case after Rusch had verbally assured the defense that "no judge would issue a search warrant for the offices of a defense counsel" and then 2 days later, signing that warrant.

The Texas Criminal Defense Association had earlier filed an amicus curiae brief which in strong terms, condemned the "raid on lawyer's office" as being "offensive to the Texas Constitutional and the Constitution of the United States" and called it "reprehensible".

Now the Texas 5th Court of Appeals will weigh into the whole sordid mess caused by prosecutors who decided to "raid" a defense attorney's office.

Bill

============================

Notes:

Application for Writs of Mandamus and/or Prohibition with Incorporated Brief in Support and Motion for Stay of Proceedings Below, by Steven Miears and Keith Gore before the Texas 5th Court of Appeals, November 20, 2009

Case 401-80353-08 Texas vs. Mark Bell, case history -- Collin County 401st District Court

Judge Rusch recused from Bell murder trial, McKinney Courier-Gazette, August 27, 2008

Hearing on "raid" of attorney office rescheduled CCO - August 7, 2008

Amicus Curiae brief of the TCDA, August 5, 2008

Defense attorney search warrant motion hearing moved - McKinney Courier-Gazette, Aug. 6, 2008

One of these days these boots are going to walk all over your attorney-client privilege - Grits for Breakfast, Aug. 3, 2008

Where are the boots?: Details from the Gore warrant, affidavit and return - CCO, July 31, 2008

The Warrant, affidavit and return and more

The Defense motion in Response to the State's Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel

MCG - AG opposes subpoenas of Rusch and Dry - CCO, July 23, 2008

Not Judge Rusch's first controversial warrant - CCO, July 21, 2008

NBC5 - Detectives Seize Documents From Murder-For-Hire Suspect's Attorney - CCO, July 18, 2008

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Local Attorney [Visitor]
Since the facts of this case are still in dispute, its probably a bit premature to say which side is fully in the wrong here, but it is clear that the over-aggressive actions of the DA's office have once again cost the county a lot of money for no reason other than the pride and arrogance of the DA's office.

Meanwhile a capital case is just needlessly delayed because the DA's offcie thinks they can do whatever they want and run around the courts, the judges, and the constitution whenever they feel like it.

If just one judge would have the stones to stand up to Roach and his minions, perhaps this whole snafu could have been avoided and the DA would have to prove their case the old fashioned way - with legally obtained evidence.

Judge Rusch is a well-intentioned man, but he allowed himself to be duped by the DA's office, and now he is paying the price for it while they still consider themselves untouchable. its just sad.
PermalinkPermalink 11/23/09 @ 17:55

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

The Collin County Observer

You can observe a lot by just watching.
Yogi Berra

It is my hope that this forum will serve as an acute observer of Collin County government, leading to the return of the county to those it is supposed to serve.

I will post my opinions, fair analysis, news clippings that are relevant to local issues, and your comments.

To post your comment, you may register, or you may post anonymously. Comments will be reviewed before being placed online.

Comments that I consider inappropriate will be deleted, and the commentator warned. All I ask is that discussions remain civil and courteous. The standard for comments here is "common courtesy".

Subscribers will receive an email whenever a new blog entry is posted.

Bill Baumbach

Find more discussion of CCO topics on The Collin County Observer Facebook Group.

Add to Technorati Favorites

TESTIMONIALS

"Love you to death Bill, but you're like a hemmoroid that keeps swelling and won't go away."
Rick Neudorff, past Chair Collin County GOP

"Your premise is wrong, as it often is."
John R. Roach, Collin County District Attorney



July 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Files and Links

2006 Bill's Campaign for County Commissioner

County Government

Voting Rights & Education

Indigent Legal Defense

Indigent Healthcare

Texas Legislature

Texas Blogs

Commissioners Blogs

Mobility

2007 Bond Election

2008 Budget

Collin County Discussion Boards

Courts & Judiciary

Collin County Info & Stuff

Community Life, Art & Assistance

News Media

Financial Transparency

2009 Budget

Families & Children

Demographics

2010 Budget

Public Meeting Broadcasts & Videos

2010 Election

2010 Finance Reports

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 25

powered by b2evolution free blog software