« Second Collin County prosecutor 'resigns' over alleged DWI fixTucker announces race for 219th District Court »

1 comment

Comment from: Collin County Citizen [Visitor] Email
I'd like to express a concern about judges receiving the endorsement of law enforcement associations.

First, Collin County judges have general jurisdiction - meaning they hear everything from criminal matters, civil lawsuits, tax cases, divorce and suit affecting parent/child relationships. The docket of Collin County's district judges is very diverse and complex. Only a small percentage of each judge's docket includes criminal cases. If this were Dallas County, then judges have very specific areas over which they preside. It's important to remember this.

Secondly, law enforcement associations tend to look to a single pool of candidates - the DA's office. Most law enforcement officers only know attorneys in the DA's office as they work closely with them in the preparation for trial and prosecution of alleged criminals. It would be unlikely that the 'movers and shakers' of a law enforcement association would have any knowledge about the county's best litigators, family law attorneys, or any other area of practice save criminal law.

Thirdly, I have a real problem with law enforcement associations endorsing candidates before the filing deadline. They don't even know exactly who will be running. They just find the roughest and toughest prosecutor running for judge and then endorse them carte blanche.

Now, this being said, I support Mr. Becker, and I can't blame him for touting his endorsements. But, the premise of law enforcement associations endorsing candidates without knowing who is running and rarely, if ever, endorsing anyone for any other credential other than tenure in the DA's office, gives credence to the notion that these groups have severe bias and shouldn't be the only factor that voters consider when voting for or against a candidate for a Collin County district court.
11/03/09 @ 04:37

Comments are closed for this post.